Foreign
Holding Company
A foreign businessman approached Miller Grossbard & Associates
for assistance in forming a U.S. network of service companies,
establishing a domestic and an offshore ownership structure,
and shaping the offers for buying targeted companies. The goal
of the foreign owner was to minimize the near-term investment
required to meet his objectives. To accomplish this meant reducing
the tax burden on the organization and creating offers with
significant contingent price components. These were all immediate
needs.
The first challenge was to understand the foreign situation
so that an offshore structure could be devised that would
minimize domestic taxation, be compatible with the existing
foreign ownership, and not incur unnecessary foreign taxes.
After receiving information about the foreign organization
and its plan for expansion into the United States, Miller
Grossbard identified several tax traps and proposed alternatives
that would avoid or defer potential U.S. income taxes.
As work progressed on the design of the foreign ownership,
a structure began to develop for the domestic network of service
companies. After considering the needs of the operating organization,
a combination of partnerships and corporations was proposed
in conjunction with a domestic holding company. The objective
of this structure was to allow the decentralizing of management
and to permit essential individuals to participate in ownership.
The proposed organization also considered the capital requirements
and the tax burden that would result.
The recommendations for the U.S. organization and the foreign
ownership structure were both adopted.
The last part of the assignment was more intricate. Miller
Grossbard investigated proposals and counteroffers before
developing a strategy that would be acceptable to both buyer
and seller. Because of our knowledge of federal and state
tax systems and our understanding of the time value of money,
Miller Grossbard was able to construct an offer that would
accommodate both buyer and seller. We looked for trade-offs
between cash to the seller today and deferred compensation
at a lower tax rate in the future. The analysis included considerations
of definite versus contingent payments, income versus capital
gain, state income taxes, FICA and Medicare taxes, as well
as the time value of money. Given the multitude of variables,
the challenge was merely to find the combination that yielded
a result suitable to both parties.
|